M: "a requirement that is quite human"
Yesterday, Parliament decided in accordance with the Government's proposal to introduce a security requirement for family reunification. It was hard tongågnar in the House when the opposition opposes the proposal. TCO has, like most respondents, strongly negative opinion, including a letter that is referenced in the debate in the House.
According to the bill is one of the aims of introducing a supply requirements to strengthen the driving forces for organizing work and home ownership, thereby promoting health and inclusion. It is a good purpose. Government assumes, however, assumed that drivers today are too weak and that the migrant people do not want to develop its own security and prefer to live in low remuneration. It is a description of reality that TCO does not share. There is no shortage of drivers that allow newcomers have difficulty finding jobs. Inadequate induction, ethnic discrimination in employment and lack of jobs, especially in an era of double digit näranog unemployment, are the main reasons for the new arrivals have difficulty finding jobs. Supply requirements will be an unreasonable burden of responsibility for the establishment of labor on the individual.
A basic prerequisite for a good establishment in Sweden is that the immigrant will be able to as soon as possible to be reunited with their relatives. Not to allow relatives such as spouse or partner to come to Sweden unless related person a permanent residence permit in Sweden and has lived here with a residence permit for residence of four years is to significantly hamper a good establishment in Sweden.
The introduction of supply requirements, unfortunately, rests not on empirical basis and the government has presented no evidence that security requirements will lead to a faster start. There is however a risk of a worse establishment of new arrivals and the risk of new arrivals who have advanced training from their real ability to get a job in line with their training. The newcomers might prematurely end the language training and continuing education and take a job that does not require these skills, all to be reunited with their relatives. This leads to a waste of the individual's skills and losses for the economy.
The government insists that it is important to harmonize the rules in the EU on the issue of security requirements. But harmonization of rules across the EU must never be at the expense of humanity. Overall security requirements for family reunification unjust and will hit already vulnerable individuals in an unacceptable manner.
Mikael Ceder Bratt (M) called the House proposal to supply demands for "a requirement that is quite human." After such a defense for a reform is needed may not be much opposition, but Kalle Larsson (V) raised meritorious forward to establishing a security requirement is not beneficial integration. "If you can not live close to the near, the man chosen to share his life with, it will probably not easier but harder to feel the confidence you need to take to the labor market and the strength you need to try to overcome discrimination and obtain a reasonable accommodation. That is what I mean by that is counterproductive. "

